From the New York Times
The practice of epidemiology is often dominated by the "determinants" aspect, with less priority/prestige on the "distribution" side. I appreciate this article because of how a very simple descriptive (distribution) statement sparks a lengthy discussion of potential determinants.
"In data released in 2017, the rate for white Americans was around 19 per 100,000, and it was about 7.1 for both Hispanics and Asian-Americans/Pacific Islanders, and 6.6 for Black Americans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
"Suicide rates are highest among Native American and Alaska Native populations: 21.8 per 100,000 people"
1. Let's say you are in charge of a funding agency. What hypothesis mentioned here is the one for which you would prioritise funding for a study? Why?
1b. What are the modifiable risk factors mentioned in the article?
2. At the end of this article (and indeed any article concerning suicide in reputable, mainstream print media), editors have appended a statement for self-referral. I've included the statement used for articles published in The Guardian, below. You won't see statements like this with articles about other health conditions. Why?
In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie.
In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255.
In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other
international helplines can be found at www.befrienders.org.